Comments on: New Link has been added: Scott A. Mandia http://www.gopexiles.com/?p=4290 Give me liberty or give me death... Patrick Henry Thu, 09 Sep 2010 02:09:52 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 By: MaryLou http://www.gopexiles.com/?p=4290&cpage=1#comment-858 MaryLou Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:56:37 +0000 http://www.gopexiles.com/?p=4290#comment-858 Although I am not a scientist, I am very much into politics......GW has been a hoax. Finally the email came out that the scientist are hiding the decline, what does that say????? All original data has been discarded......WHY???? so how can these scientists do anything without original data????? This is all about politics.....They are lying , cheating, deleting information to prove this is false......What other proof do you need???? These scientist just needs the funds to keep their jobs.....and that is it.....they need to find other things to analyze, like some medical advances or something......This is all about the government CONTROL.....you believers need to take your heads out of the sand and for just a moment, listen, and stop talking.... Although I am not a scientist, I am very much into politics……GW has been a hoax. Finally the email came out that the scientist are hiding the decline, what does that say????? All original data has been discarded……WHY???? so how can these scientists do anything without original data????? This is all about politics…..They are lying , cheating, deleting information to prove this is false……What other proof do you need???? These scientist just needs the funds to keep their jobs…..and that is it…..they need to find other things to analyze, like some medical advances or something……This is all about the government CONTROL…..you believers need to take your heads out of the sand and for just a moment, listen, and stop talking….

]]> By: Patriot76 http://www.gopexiles.com/?p=4290&cpage=1#comment-791 Patriot76 Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:21:18 +0000 http://www.gopexiles.com/?p=4290#comment-791 Scott - thanks for corresponding with Exile. Also I want to thank you for your polite comments on our blog. Likewise we often get comments that are rude or just plan ridiculous so it is refreshing to see thoughtful well though out post. Exile - I was listening to two geologist who spoke on teh Rush Limbaugh show today - they were quite fascinating and I hope we get to hear them more in the future. Neither of them agree with the AGW science as well. Both said it was of course a natural cycle and the second geologist a woman was very interesting. She stated that you never come to a firm conclusion in science but only the best conclusion or hypothesis that cannot be disproven as of yet by any other hypothesis. Scott - thanks for corresponding with Exile. Also I want to thank you for your polite comments on our blog. Likewise we often get comments that are rude or just plan ridiculous so it is refreshing to see thoughtful well though out post.

Exile - I was listening to two geologist who spoke on teh Rush Limbaugh show today - they were quite fascinating and I hope we get to hear them more in the future. Neither of them agree with the AGW science as well. Both said it was of course a natural cycle and the second geologist a woman was very interesting. She stated that you never come to a firm conclusion in science but only the best conclusion or hypothesis that cannot be disproven as of yet by any other hypothesis.

]]> By: Scott A. Mandia http://www.gopexiles.com/?p=4290&cpage=1#comment-790 Scott A. Mandia Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:10:50 +0000 http://www.gopexiles.com/?p=4290#comment-790 Cathy, It has been a pleasure chatting with you via email. The fact that you have posted my link, even though you disagree with much of the content there, shows how open-minded and fair you are. Thank you. As I told you, I often get "hate email" when some folks come across my page and do not like the message I bring so our exchange was refreshing. BTW, you are free to post anything I have said to you in my emails if you think it adds to the discussion. I stand by my comments and have no issue with the public reading them. I ask you and your readers to take a look at one specific Web page that I have just recently posted that tries to explain why there is so much misinformation about global warming: http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/mandias/global_warming/global_warming_misinformation_reasons.html I think Reason #3 might make your readers take a pause. Granted, it is just one study, but it is illuminating and I can speak to the authors' conclusions because I run into this attitude when I post on conservative-leaning blogs. Finally, regarding ClimateGate: There are many scientists from many fields that have published data that show the effects of global warming and why humans are the primary drivers of this warming. These scientists include some of the obvious: climatologists, meteorologists, geologists, modelers, and oceanographers. Some less obvious include: biologists, marine biologists, zoologists, chemistry, astrophysics, economists, environmental politics, and others. I am quite confident that MANY of these folks have NEVER spoken to the CRU folks nor emailed them. Cathy,

It has been a pleasure chatting with you via email. The fact that you have posted my link, even though you disagree with much of the content there, shows how open-minded and fair you are. Thank you. As I told you, I often get “hate email” when some folks come across my page and do not like the message I bring so our exchange was refreshing.

BTW, you are free to post anything I have said to you in my emails if you think it adds to the discussion. I stand by my comments and have no issue with the public reading them.

I ask you and your readers to take a look at one specific Web page that I have just recently posted that tries to explain why there is so much misinformation about global warming:

http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/mandias/global_warming/global_warming_misinformation_reasons.html

I think Reason #3 might make your readers take a pause. Granted, it is just one study, but it is illuminating and I can speak to the authors’ conclusions because I run into this attitude when I post on conservative-leaning blogs.

Finally, regarding ClimateGate: There are many scientists from many fields that have published data that show the effects of global warming and why humans are the primary drivers of this warming. These scientists include some of the obvious: climatologists, meteorologists, geologists, modelers, and oceanographers. Some less obvious include: biologists, marine biologists, zoologists, chemistry, astrophysics, economists, environmental politics, and others. I am quite confident that MANY of these folks have NEVER spoken to the CRU folks nor emailed them.

]]>